Personal tools
You are here: Home Editorials Human Rights Day 2010: It's one to lament
Document Actions

Human Rights Day 2010: It's one to lament

Jason Edelstein, from the Jerusalem-based research institute NGO Monitor, describes a sorry state of affairs in advance of Human Rights Day, in a Special to The Enterprise (12/10/2010).

Human Rights Day 2010: It's one to lament

Today, the international community marks International Human Rights Day, the anniversary of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Conventions. Unfortunately, there is more to lament than celebrate. Although numerous institutions and organizations were established to protect and advance these rights, the international community fails to live up to its moral commitments.

Throughout Africa, particularly in Sudan and the Congo, mass killings continue. Dictatorships in Iran, North Korea, Venezuela and China continue to repress their citizens. Frequently, we have seen their leaders demonstrate open hostility toward democratic countries.

In all instances, relative to the gravity of the violation, the human rights organizations, international institutions, and the media barely bat an eyelash. Worse, many of these abusers have hijacked the very entities meant to hold them accountable. China and Libya sit on the U.N. Human Rights Council, the body established five years ago to safeguard human rights. No wonder these societies see so little progress.

The council has shown an expertise in manipulation of human rights principles to avoid criticism of and reform to abuses of its member states. The Organization of the Islamic Conference, which controls the council's agenda and chooses its officials, has no interest in opening a discussion of the systematic oppression of women or minorities in their societies. Sadly, as long as the Organization of the Islamic Conference controls this and other agencies, change in Saudi Arabia, Syria, Sudan, Libya and the like is doubtful.

To make matters worse, their control over these institutions is increasing — U.N. Women, a new agency formed to advance women's rights, will include Saudi Arabia as a member. Yet again, those that violate basic rights will control international arenas designed to hold them accountable.

Unfortunately, the human rights nongovernmental organizations created to offset the unethical behavior and biases of governments have become accomplices. In advance of the Human Rights Council's review process, NGO superpowers Human Rights Watch, International Federation for Human Rights and Amnesty International submitted a proposal with glaring omissions. The document failed to note the hypocrisy of the sitting council members or the fact that condemnation of Israel is the only permanent agenda item. Both examples come at the expense of addressing real human rights abuses around the world.

This is indicative of the wider exploitation of human rights rhetoric by NGOs and lack of accountability. Amnesty International suspended a senior staff member/whistleblower after she condemned Amnesty's alliance with an alleged Taliban supporter. Amnesty's interim secretary general then defended the organization's actions by noting that “jihad in self-defense” is not “antithetical to human rights.” The fallout from this scandal severely damaged the credibility of one of the world's supposed leaders in the protection of human rights.

But that was not even the most egregious case. During the Gaza flotilla incident, human rights rhetoric was abused and manipulated to an extraordinary extent. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty and smaller NGOs failed to note that Turkish IHH, the main flotilla organizer and a member of Union of the Good, is an umbrella of more than 50 Islamic organizations designated by the U.S. government as “an organization created by Hamas leadership to transfer funds to the terrorist organization.”

NGO networks repeatedly distorted international law by referring to the Gaza situation as “collective punishment” and termed Israeli force “excessive,” stripping away the confrontational and violent nature of the alleged “humanitarian activists.” The NGO activism led to unbalanced reports that claimed Israel never disengaged from Gaza, among other statements making a mockery of universal human rights.

For next year's Human Rights Day to be a celebration, the powerful NGOs must stand behind the countries standing up to the international bullies. This, unfortunately, has not been the case. Canada defended Israel's right to self-defense and cut funding to NGOs that demonize Israel by invoking the empty rhetoric of “apartheid” and bringing “lawfare” cases against Israeli officials.

Instead of applauding, Human Rights Watch chastised Prime Minister Stephen Harper, saying that “Canada no longer acts as a leader — or at least the kind of leader that once was so widely admired.” HRW was echoing a viewpoint favored by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, and the OIC reportedly punished Canada by conspiring to deny it a seat on the U.N. Security Council.

For individuals committed to fulfilling the true intentions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the rhetoric and basic moral standards associated with that document must be reclaimed. Countries with open societies should be leading the international institutions that can serve as the vehicles for those reclamations. It is the closed societies that should be marginalized. The human rights NGOs, who wield so much power today, should demand nothing less.

— Jason Edelstein is communications director of NGO Monitor, a Jerusalem-based research institution that tracks nongovernmental organizations that claim to promote human rights in the Middle East. This piece was published originally in The Jewish Week,

This site provided with the assistance of the Davis Community Network.